I was vacuously sharpening a pencil the other day when something about the experience stopped me.
The pencil sharpener has not been improved in over a hundred years. Nobody has added Bluetooth to it. It doesn't need firmware updates. It doesn't ask for my email. You put the pencil in, you turn it, you get a sharp pencil. The transaction is complete. There is nothing left over. No notification, upsell, or suggested content based on your previous sharpening history.
It just does one thing. And then it's done.
As I stood there, I realized that almost nothing else in my life works like this anymore.
Nobody has added Bluetooth to it. It doesn't need firmware updates. It
bithaven wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
up in the landfill. Exactly the same for battery operated devices. When your proprietary battery can no longer hold its charge, your
weed-eater, lawnmower, cordless drill, also ends up in the trash,
costing you and the environment more.
An interesting blog post about monotechnology:
I was vacuously sharpening a pencil the other day when something about
the experience stopped me.
The pencil sharpener has not been improved in over a hundred years.
Nobody has added Bluetooth to it. It doesn't need firmware updates. It doesn't ask for my email. You put the pencil in, you turn it, you get a sharp pencil. The transaction is complete. There is nothing left over.
No notification, upsell, or suggested content based on your previous sharpening history.
It just does one thing. And then it's done.
As I stood there, I realized that almost nothing else in my life works
like this anymore.
https://www.whitenoise.email/p/a-manifesto-for-monofunctional-technology
Nightfox wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
The pencil sharpener is something that just works, and works well, if you're using a traditional pencil.
boraxman wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
I share this frustration. So much doesn't work right. It works, but
its janky, confusing, often doesn't do what you want. Needlessly
complex.
I share this frustration. So much doesn't work right. It works, but its janky, confusing, often doesn't do what you want. Needlessly complex.
I agree completely with this, but, contrary to it, I continue to run a
BBS - which has for most of the time been janky, confusing and
needlessly complex. :)
boraxman wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
In a way yes! But actually, everything is still kind of predictable
and can be reasoned with. Some BBSs are simple, and do what they are supposed to do.
| Sysop: | John Richards |
|---|---|
| Location: | Escatawpa, MS |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 493529:49:09 |
| Calls: | 5 |
| Files: | 46 |
| U/L today: |
2 files (59K bytes) |
| D/L today: |
12 files (16,621K bytes) |
| Messages: | 4,282 |